'They really wrote this and then published it,' senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute Chris Rufo marveled
The New York Times was skewered Tuesday for a headline about Meta fact-checkers fact-checking their own critics.
Meta announced that it would be ending its controversial fact-checking practices and lifting restrictions on speech to "restore free expression" across Facebook, Instagram and Meta platforms, admitting its current content moderation practices have "gone too far."
But former third-party fact-check partners objected to the allegations of bias and censorship in their work. PolitiFact's Aaron Sharockman blasted the decision in a social media post, saying, "If Meta is upset it created a tool to censor, it should look in the mirror."
The New York Times published a piece about the backlash from such fact-checker organizations headlined, "Meta Says Fact-Checkers Were the Problem. Fact-Checkers Rule That False." The article said, "Fact-checking groups that worked with Meta said they had no role in deciding what the company did with the content that was fact-checked."
NEW YORK, NY - OCTOBER 23: The corporate logo of the New York Times hangs above the front door of their headquarters on October 23, 2018 in New York City. (Photo by Gary Hershorn/Getty Images) (Photo by Gary Hershorn/Getty Images)
FACEBOOK ADMITS 'MISTAKE' IN CENSORING ICONIC TRUMP ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT PHOTO: 'THIS WAS AN ERROR'
But users across the X social media platform mocked the headline.
"This actually does an effective job revealing the problem with the fact-checking industry (perhaps by accident)," Reason senior editor Robby Soave observed.
This actually does an effective job revealing the problem with the fact-checking industry (perhaps by accident).
— Robby Soave (@robbysoave) January 7, 2025
"Fact-checkers fact-check claim that fact-checkers are the problem. Real headline from the NY Times," civil liberties attorney Laura Powell noted. "How can anyone produce satire when the legacy media has become so ridiculous?"
Fact-checkers fact-check claim that fact-checkers are the problem.
— Laura Powell (@LauraPowellEsq) January 7, 2025
Real headline from the NY Times.
How can anyone produce satire when the legacy media has become so ridiculous? pic.twitter.com/n9AQp1Scfp
"This is amazing. Meta says fact-checkers were the problem Fact-checkers rule that false," Analytics Miami founder Ana Bozovic said in a post. "Rounding off the absurdity: this is the NYT reporting."
This is amazing.
— Ana Bozovic (@ana_analytics_) January 7, 2025
Meta says fact-checkers were the problem Fact-checkers rule that false.
Rounding off the absurdity: this is the NYT reporting. pic.twitter.com/3oszSFn93Q
Tech billionaires, including Bezos and Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, have been supportive of Trump since his Election Day victory. (Getty Images)
"They really wrote this and then published it," senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute Chris Rufo marveled.
They really wrote this and then published it. pic.twitter.com/vepEbYrQYX
— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) January 7, 2025
The Federalist editor-in-chief Mollie Z. Hemingway wrote, "A beyond parody headline from propaganda outlet New York Times."
A beyond parody headline from propaganda outlet New York Times pic.twitter.com/i8TIoLbpS8
— Mollie (@MZHemingway) January 7, 2025
"I had to look it up myself because I could not believe it wasn't parody," political columnist Moshe Hill wrote in surprise, "It's real."
I had to look it up myself because I could not believe it wasn't parody.
— Moshe Hill (@HillWithView) January 7, 2025
It's realhttps://t.co/20zGgltXTg
Meteorologist and data scientist John Basham joked that the headline "could have easily been" from political satire website, The Babylon Bee, adding, "Life Has Become Parody On The Left."
REPORT: In A @nytimes Headline That Could Have Easily Been @TheBabylonBee The Times Said, "Meta Says Fact-Checkers Were The Problem. Fact Checkers Rule That [Statement] False."
— John Basham (@JohnBasham) January 7, 2025
Life Has Become Parody On The Left. pic.twitter.com/tCIiyK9Gfp
FACEBOOK HAS ‘INTERFERED’ WITH US ELECTIONS 39 TIMES SINCE 2008: STUDY
Fox News' Andrew Mark Miller contributed to this report.
Alexander Hall is an associate editor for Fox News Digital. Story tips can be sent to