China Applauds Australia’s Retreat from Red Sea International Naval Mission

The Chinese government was quick to cheer Australia’s rejection of a United States’ call to send a warship to help police vital Red Sea trade routes, gushing Wednesday that Canberra was finally stepping out of America’s “shadow.”

In an opinion piece published by China’s tame state-run media – the Global Times newspaper – author Jerry Grey celebrated the left-wing Labor government of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese reported refusal to send a warship to the Middle East, and Australia’s recent U.N. vote for a ceasefire in contrast to that of the U.S..

He said the moves proved Australia was “distancing itself from the US.”

“(Australia) has finally stepped out of the US’ shadow to call for a ceasefire and could potentially act as a mediator in the conflict if needed. That opportunity will be lost if it has a military presence in the region. It is sensible for Australia to continue distancing itself from the US,” the paper said.

The article, titled “Sensible for Australia to refuse US Red Sea Warship” came with a cartoon of a kangaroo standing at the edge of a hole with a U.S.-branded shovel nearby.

As Breitbart News reported, the Albanese government had been dithering for the better part of a week over whether or not to answer the call from one of its oldest and most steadfast allies.

The direct U.S. request was for Australia to join the expanding multi-national naval force patrolling the Red Sea to keep one of the world’s major trade arteries open.

The Iran-aligned Yemeni Shiite jihadist terror organization, known more commonly as the Houthis, has vowed to block ships heading to Israel until the offensive on the Gaza Strip is ended and has been repeatedly firing missiles at merchant ships in the area.

The international response has been to send warships to counter the attacks, with the U.S., UK, Israel, and France leading the coalition forming the Combined Maritime Forces ready to fight back.

Other participants in the effort include Bahrain, Canada, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Seychelles and Spain.

Not so Australia which seems to lack the political will to answer a call from its key ally in Washington, with Albanese slammed as “weak” by critics.

Australia’s conservative opposition has also turned on the government, saying inaction has made Australia a less reliable partner.

In a joint statement the shadow treasurer and shadow foreign affairs and defence ministers said Albanese needed to explain why Australia would not support an international effort to secure the trade route.

“Failing to contribute to securing this trade route means Australians will pay the price for the prime minister’s lack of leadership, with over 12 percent of the world’s trade coming through the Suez Canal,” the opposition frontbenchers said.

“This route requires twice the amount of fuel, adding tens of millions in extra costs to the operators, having a flow-on effect to cargo owners and inevitably consumers, causing further supply chain shocks.”

While Albanese rejects sending a single warship from Australia’s naval fleet, his government is prepared to “examine” the prospect of sending “further personnel” to Red Sea onshore staff.

Follow Simon Kent on Twitter: Follow @SunSimonKent or e-mail to: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.