NRA finds surprising ally in ACLU for Supreme Court challenge to NY blacklist allegation

The ACLU stressed it does not support the NRA but will defend free speech rights

Supreme Court adopts modified code of ethics policy

FOX News correspondent David Spunt has the latest details on the Supreme Court adopting a formal code of conduct on 'Special Report.'

The National Rifle Association (NRA) has found an unlikely ally in the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) as the group pursues its First Amendment case before the Supreme Court

"The NRA is proud to stand with the ACLU and others who recognize this important truth: regulatory authority cannot be used to silence political speech," NRA President Charles Cotton said after adding the ACLU as co-counsel for the case. 

"This case is important not only to the Association, but all who openly advocate for the causes and issues in which they believe," Cotton continued. 

The NRA filed its 2018 challenge following the revelation that former New York State Department of Financial Services Superintendent Maria T. Vullo, at the order of former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, allegedly blacklisted the NRA – effectively forcing banks and insurers to cut ties with the group.

GUN RIGHTS GROUP APPLAUDS AFTER FEDERAL APPEALS COURT DEALS BLOW ON NY CONCEALED CARRY LAW

The NRA fired back at this action by claiming it violated First Amendment rights to free speech. The lawsuit alleges that Vullo made "backroom threats" against regulated firms, accompanied by offers of leniency on unrelated infractions if regulated entities would agree to blacklist the NRA.

NRA President Cotton

Charles Cotton, president of the National Rifle Association (Jon Cherry/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

The lawsuit defeated multiple challenges and setbacks before the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case. The NRA sees the ACLU’s support as a major confirmation of its arguments. 

"The ACLU joining as counsel underscores the importance of this First Amendment case and the NRA's position that government officials cannot use intimidation tactics to silence those with whom those officials disagree," William A. Brewer III, partner at Brewer, Attorneys & Counselors and counsel for the NRA, said of the development. 

SUPREME COURT APPEARS WARY OF MASSIVE TAX CODE OVERHAUL

"The ACLU is a leading voice on legal and constitutional issues and is a welcome addition to this advocacy," Brewer added. 

ACLU Legal Director Cole

ACLU's David Cole attends the Aasif Mandvi & Friends All-Star Deportation Jamboree at City Winery on April 26, 2017 in New York City.   (Jim Spellman/WireImage)

The ACLU’s national legal director David Cole acknowledged that the decision to assist the NRA will prove controversial within and beyond the group, but argued that while it’s "never easy to defend those with whom you disagree… the ACLU has long stood for the proposition that we may disagree with what you say but will defend to the death your right to say it."

"In this hyper-polarized environment, where few are willing to cross the aisle on anything, the fact that the A.C.L.U. is defending the N.R.A. here only underscores the importance of the free speech principle at stake," Cole wrote in a statement to the New York Times. 

NRA CALLS CHUCK SCHUMER'S LATEST GUN BILL ‘ATTACK’ ON CONSTITUTION

The group made clear that it does not support the NRA or its mission, but that it also did not support public officials abusing their power to blacklist an organization "just because they oppose an organization’s political views." 

US Supreme Court building on a sunny day

The Supreme Court is seen Wednesday, June 29, 2022, in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

A Second Circuit court struck down the effort in 2022, arguing that New York’s financial regulators had a reasonable duty to warn banks and businesses about "social backlash" for associating with the NRA, calling it part of the "enhanced corporate social responsibility." 

The Supreme Court agreed to review the decision and review on the question of "Does the First Amendment allow a government regulator to threaten regulated entities with adverse regulatory actions if they do business with a controversial speaker, as a consequence of (a) the government’s own hostility to the speaker’s viewpoint or (b) a perceived "general backlash" against the speaker’s advocacy?"

The answer will impact the relationship between state regulators and private entities, which the NRA argues currently "gives state officials free rein to financially blacklist their political opponents." 

Fox News Digital’s Brianna Herlihy contributed to this report. 

Peter Aitken is a Fox News Digital reporter with a focus on national and global news. 

Authored by Peter Aitken via FoxNews December 9th 2023