Plaintiffs argue the lack of IVF coverage is discriminatory
NYC schools leader reveals antisemitism case that has ‘troubled’ him the most
New York City Public Schools Chancellor David Banks grilled in exchange with Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y.
New York City is facing a lawsuit from a gay male employee who argues that the city's policy of only providing in vitro fertilization coverage to women is discriminatory.
The Thursday lawsuit was filed by former assistant district attorney Corey Briskin and his husband, who say they had to put off plans for IVF due to the lack of financial support.
City policy currently only covers IVF procedures in cases where the employee or their partner are infertile.
The lawsuit comes as the New York City Council is considering legislation that would change the city's rules, mandating IVF coverage for all employees regardless of marital status or sexual orientation, Reuters reported.
FOLLOWING IVF RULING, BIDEN TO SEND HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES SECRETARY TO VISIT ALABAMA
New York City is facing a lawsuit from a gay male employee who argues that the city's policy of providing in vitro fertilization coverage only to women is discriminatory. (Fox News Photo/Joshua Comins)
"No court has yet opined on the issue of whether gay men can be denied IVF benefits given to other employees," Peter Romer-Friedman, a lawyer for Briskin and his husband, told the outlet.
ALABAMA PROVIDERS SUSPEND IVF TREATMENTS AFTER STATE COURT’S RULING AS FERTILITY EXPERTS WEIGH IN
The lawsuit claims that withholding IVF coverage violates the city's guarantees against discrimination based on sexual orientation as well as the equal rights and due process protections in the U.S. Constitution.
New York City Hall. The Thursday lawsuit claims that withholding IVF coverage violates the city's guarantees against discrimination based on sexual orientation as well as the equal rights and due process protections in the U.S. Constitution.
IVF issues have been thrust into the spotlight in recent months thanks to questions about how the practice interacts with some abortion restrictions.
An Alabama Supreme Court ruling caused three state fertility clinics to stop offering IVF services. The Alabama ruling prompted a wave of national Republicans to come out in support of IVF, while some conservatives said it is an issue best left to individual states.
ALABAMA HOUSE, SENATE PASS PROTECTIONS FOR IVF AFTER COURT RULING
Democrats, however, have used the ruling as a political cudgel against the right, claiming that Republicans would crack down on IVF access and reproductive health measures nationwide – an attack that those on the right have denied.
A container with frozen embryos and sperm stored in liquid nitrogen is removed at a fertility clinic in Fort Myers, Florida. (AP Photo/Lynne Sladky, File)
Just one cycle of IVF treatment could cost between $15,000 and $30,000, depending on the clinic and a person’s medical history. Briskin and other gay male employees would only be able to access IVF through surrogacy.
Anders Hagstrom is a reporter with Fox News Digital covering national politics and major breaking news events. Send tips to
