The OH bill seeks to eliminate almost all diversity and inclusion training requirements in public colleges
An Ohio House committee cleared a contentious higher education bill Wednesday that would eliminate nearly all diversity and inclusion training requirements in Ohio's public colleges and universities and bar them from taking stances on "controversial topics," despite House leadership claiming it doesn't have the votes.
Republican House Speaker Jason Stephens told reporters last week that the measure didn't have enough support in the GOP-dominated House and that he had no intentions of pushing it to a floor vote.
OHIO JUDGE PUTS MASSIVE GOP-BACKED EDUCATION OVERHAUL ON HOLD
Even so, the House Higher Education Committee voted out the legislation, known to be a high priority for Senate President Matt Huffman, who is poised to challenge Stephens for the speaker position once his term in the Senate ends in 2025. The measure previously passed in the Senate with a majority Republican vote, although three GOP members broke away from their party to join Democrats in voting against it.
The Ohio measure is part of a broader trend in Republican-led states targeting diversity, equity and inclusion in higher education.
A spokesperson for Stephens did not immediately respond to a phone message seeking comment.
Committee Chair Rep. Tom Young, a Dayton-area Republican, told reporters Wednesday that the committee vote is the first step in seeing whether or not Stephens' words hold weight.
"I think the votes are there," he said, but added that they'll have to wait and see.
Supporters of the measure have called it necessary to rid higher education of bias, promote "intellectual diversity" and help protect conservative speech on campuses. It comes alongside other Republican-led states targeting diversity, equity and inclusion in higher education this year.
GOP-BACKED OHIO EDUCATION OVERHAUL NOTCHES KEY WIN IN ONGOING LAWSUIT
But opponents, including university students and faculty, as well as the 61,000-student Ohio State University, have spoken out against the bill. Many have argued the legislation encourages censorship and allows the Legislature to micromanage higher education — particularly when it comes to defining subjective terms like "bias," "intellectual diversity" and "controversial matters."
Ranking Democratic committee member Rep. Joseph Miller slammed the measure after Wednesday's vote, calling the legislation anti-education and anti-union.
"It attacks the very institution that is formed in Ohio to provide Ohioans with an opportunity to better their lives by educating themselves for the next stage of life as an adult," Miller said.
